Stakeholders+Analysis

HOME | ACTION PLAN | EDUCATION PLANNING | NUTRITION IN GUATEMALA | STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS | PROPOSED NEEDS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE | COLD CLIMATE FRUIT TREES | STRAWBERRY PRODUCTION | PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS =Stakeholders Analysis= Groups || Interests at Stake in relation to project || Effect of project on interests -O+ || Stakeholder importance for project success: U,1,2,3,4,5 || Degree of influence of stakeholder: U,1,2,3,4,5 || || 5  ||  3  ||  San Pablo Farmers || New Crops || +/-  ||  5  ||  5  || Las Mujeres || Improved Health of Children || ? || 5  ||  5  ||  Community Greenhouse Participants || Expand Greenhouse || +  ||  5  ||  3  || || 2  ||
 * Stakeholder
 * San Pablo Parents || Improved health of children ||  ?  ||  5  ||  5  ||
 * ^  || Nutrition Education ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Community Togetherness ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * San Pablo Children || Improved Health ||  ?
 * ^  || Decreased dental caries? ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Decreased DMII? ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Nutrition Education ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Revenue ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Increased knowledge of ag practices ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * Entire Community || Revenue ||  +  ||  3  ||  5  ||
 * ^  || Community Business/Jobs ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Decreased Health costs ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Save $ on food ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Community togetherness ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Increased Fruit Consumption ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Time with children ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Women’s equality – shift in gender roles ||  ?  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Add educational programs ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Increased awareness of ag practices ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||
 * Our Group || Cultural Awareness ||  +  ||  3
 * ^  || Practical application of knowledge in our various fields || + ||^   ||^   ||
 * ^  || Good Grade ||  +  ||^   ||^   ||

Process ||||||||  Type of Participation  ||   || (1 wayflow) ||  Consultation (2 wayflow) ||   Collaboration (increasingcontrolover decisionmaking)   ||  Empowerment (controltransferfor decisionsand resources) ||   || Influence ||||||||||||  Importance of Stakeholder for success of project  ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   || Appraisal ||   ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||   ||
 * || StageinProject
 * ^  ||^   ||  Communication
 * ^  ||  Identification  ||   ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||   ||
 * Stakeholder
 * ^  ||  Unknown  ||  None 1  ||  2  ||  3  ||  4  ||  Great 5  ||  Preparationand
 * Unknown ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   ||
 * ^  ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||  Implementation  ||   ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF, SPC  ||   ||
 * None1 ||   ||   ||   ||

|| ||   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   || ||   ||   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   ||  Monitoring  ||   ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||   || ||  ||  SPP, SPF, LM  ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   ||
 * 2 ||   ||   ||   ||  Our Group
 * ^  ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||  Supervision and
 * 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || SPC, CGP ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||^   ||   ||
 * 4 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||  Evaluation  ||   ||  All  ||  All  ||  LM, CG, SPP, SPF  ||   ||
 * Great5 ||   ||   ||   ||  EC